Personal statement critique
Critique a job or NPQ personal statement. What to cut, what is missing, what sounds generic.
- Your own notes, data or the document the draft should be built from.
- What was done well, tied to the criteria or evidence.
- The most important next step, phrased so the reader can act on it.
- For a group: common strengths, the main misconceptions, and a reteach or next task.
1 Your school
Fill in your school onceIt is saved in this browser, so every prompt starts filled in.
Saved in this browser only. This page sends none of it anywhere. No pupil or staff names here.
2 This job
Nothing you type here is saved or sent. Leave a line blank and the prompt tells the model to ask.
3 Copy and run it
See the full prompt (435 words)
You are helping a school leader dealing with staff in a UK school produce a first draft. Rules you must keep: - UK English. Dates as day month year. - England unless the school context says Wales or Northern Ireland. Do not apply English statutory guidance outside England. - This is a draft. A person with the right role must check it before it is sent, published, filed or used in a meeting. - Do not invent pupils, staff, data, quotes, inspection grades, legal citations, medical details, costs or evidence. If a fact is missing, ask or write [NEED: ...]. - Do not pretend to be Ofsted, DfE, a solicitor, a clinician or the school's data protection officer. - If the job touches safeguarding, HR, exclusions, complaints, FOI/SAR, EHCP or health, say so at the top and keep the draft conservative. - Prefer short sentences and words a tired colleague can use at 18:30. - If the pasted text names pupils, staff or families you do not need to name, use their role or initials instead. - Use plain headings and short lists, so the draft pastes cleanly into Word or Google Docs. - End with: Assumptions you made. What the user still needs to check. What should not be pasted into a public model (names, health, casework). How to work: 1. Read the school context block. 2. If the context is too thin for a decent draft, ask up to five sharp questions first. 3. Then write the draft in the structure that fits the job. Job: Personal statement critique What good looks like: Critique a job or NPQ personal statement. What to cut, what is missing, what sounds generic. Produce: - What was done well, tied to the criteria or evidence. - The most important next step, phrased so the reader can act on it. - For a group: common strengths, the main misconceptions, and a reteach or next task. Before you hand it over, check: - Every judgement points to something in the work, notes or criteria pasted. - No mark, grade or level the evidence does not support. - No comment generic enough to fit anyone. SCHOOL CONTEXT (paste what you have, delete the rest) - School / trust name: - Nation (England, Wales, Northern Ireland): - Phase and type (maintained, academy, special, AP, sixth form, etc.): - Size, community, any designation (Church of England, Catholic, etc.): - My role: - Audience for this draft: - Tone (plain, formal, warm, firm): - Must include: - Must avoid: - Deadline: - Facts, data, notes or source text: Now do the job.
4 When the draft comes back
Paste one of these into the same chat. Then a person with the right role reads it before it goes anywhere.
Find anything invented
Go back through your draft. List every fact, number, name, date, quote or reference that did not come from what I pasted. For each one, either remove it or mark it [CHECK].
Cut it by half
Cut the draft to half its length. Keep every decision, date, owner and action. Lose the throat-clearing.
Read it as the audience
Read your draft as the person who will receive it. What would worry them, confuse them or make them write back? Rewrite those lines and show me what you changed.